Bicentennial no s weighs 5.75g [gelöst]

39 Beiträge • 3264 Mal aufgerufen

Dieses Thema wurde im Forum Englisch veröffentlicht

» Schnellzugriff auf den neuesten Beitrag

Hi have this 5.75 no s bicentennial coin any ideas
Buster move
That is the weight that a 40% silver bicentennial is supposed to weigh - so it is probably that.
Yes I’m thinking that but the no s bicentennial does not exist making this a very rare coin if so👍I’m puzzled
Buster move
I think I have this one too.

This one is within the range of a regular circulating quarter, and there is a version where there is no mintmark. I think this might be a very nice version of a regular bicentennial quarter (as many people saved them in 1976).

If you really think this is rare, you can submit it to PCGS or NGC as a potential discovery coin.
Will do thanks for the info chap and gals I’m going mad with it all
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"​Will do thanks for the info chap and gals I’m going mad with it all
​Do you have any questions or confusion before I leave? I want to make sure I wasn't confusing.
I have a Denver mint mark bicentennial and that only ways 5.55 grams they have completely different edges
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"​I have a Denver mint mark bicentennial and that only ways 5.55 grams they have completely different edges
​It is also probably a circulation coin that is worn down.
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"
​Let me summarize my thoughts for you since there are kind of misorganized:

I believe that all of the coins are circulating versions that are within the tolerance for coins that can be released into circulation. The difference between some appearing nice and some not so much has to do with the fact that some have been circulated, whereas others have been pulled out very early before they could be properly circulated since people commonly kept the 1976 bicentennial coins to celebrate the event.
This has full reeded edge and the Denver is reeded central
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"​This has full reeded edge and the Denver is reeded central
​And...
It appears to be a circulated coin due to the fact that it is not shiny on the rim.

What exactly are you confused about?
The bicentennial no s came in a proof holder and is a amaculate it also has so many errors
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"​The bicentennial no s came in a proof holder and is a amaculate it also has so many errors
​Could you specify what kinds of errors there are?

Some unscrupulous people put nice versions of circulating coins in proof cases and sell them for much more than the actual coin is worth to people who are new to collecting.
has trust write across nose can clearly see the s I hope
Buster move
There is so many more
Buster move
Verweis : "Bustermove"has trust write across nose can clearly see the s I hope
​I don't know where you are going anymore and feel like I am either wasting my time or am the wrong person to help you. I would suggest waiting for someone else to help you.
Could you see the trust and the s though or am I going mad
Buster move
I really do appreciate your info clad coins this weight don’t exist I have searched everywhere I have a guy who is from America with a huge YouTube channel chomping at my bit he’s obsessed with this coin🤷‍♂️
Buster move
I believe what you have is a ordinary Philadelphia mint coin and there would not be a mintmark in that case. There is even a P on the flip. Why? 8/100th's of a gram can easily be attributed to an inaccurate scale.
There is no p mint mark on this coin and my scales are bang on
Buster move
Only put a i on the flip cos no mint mark coins are supposed to be Philadelphia
Buster move
My scales are calibrated with a 100g weight every time I weigh this coin and is checked with another proof and is spot on
Buster move
I have also 3 sets of scales and it’s the same with all never fails and a clad coin at 5.75g does not exist and is not in the weigh tolerance
Buster move
All I’m asking is can any of you say yes Tom loads of clad bicentennial quarters weigh this and are not rare
Buster move
The opinions here are free. If you are convinced you have something special, I suggest you send it off and pay for a professional coin grading service. Then there will be no doubt.
Thema verschoben nach "Numismatic questions" (ZacUK, 28 Nov. 2020, 06:31)
Thankyou I’m just getting a little bit frustrated
Buster move
Status geändert zu Gelöst (Bustermove, 9 Aug. 2021, 21:53)
I have one of these that is on the scale at 5.602 grams have I found something good
Verweis : "Bustermove"​Thankyou I’m just getting a little bit frustrated
​You the guy guy who had the bicentennial that was 5.605 that is what mine is
Verweis : "Bambam 904"I have one of these that is on the scale at 5.602 grams have I found something good
​No. You have a very normal 1976 Bicentennial Quarter with some slight wear. Go spend it on something worth 25 cents.

I feel and understand your frustration as I have read this thread many times and I also have one that's weighs 5.75. After reading this I was sure to recalibrate my scales and weighed it on 2 different ones dead on 5.75 no mint mark . Did you ever send yours in to get looked at or find out why this coin that isn't supposed to exsist end up existing after all… if so I' d love to know what you learned 

Hello and welcome to Numista!

 

Tolerance on weight for US coins at that time was +/- 4%.  Your coin weighs within that tolerance. If you think it's the silver version then have it tested for silver at a coin shop or jewelry store. If it turns out to be silver without a mint mark you have a special coin. If not, you have one of 800 million made. 

I have found the exact same issue.. I have a bicentennial quarter and pretty good condition but it is also represented by the Philadelphia mint though it weighs and on the reverse it looks like the drummer boy has an earring in his eye lol it looks pretty strange though somebody today told me that it was within tolerance is that true? If it should weigh 5.67 why would they have a coin within tolerance all the way up to the weight of silver.. the guy that looked at mine said that it was probably an ms65 but he's unsure because I do not have a scope I'm basically putting a microscope up to my camera and doing the best I can.. but yes that threw me off and it's definitely something you can't find any information on there hasn't been any listings of that particular type of error when it comes to a bicentennial coin but boy I was definitely wishful thinking.. I would love to have a bicentennial quarter that is actually silver but lacking a mint mark.  I have heard of other people actually having a silver coin still showing some sort of layering on the edging of the coin and I know the coin that I have it's not the bright red but there is a dull layer that kind of threw me off.. I still may take it just to be certain to a pawn shop or a jewelry shop and see if they have a handheld XRF because I am curious about the composition but it was refreshing to see that someone had the same issue I'm having..

turtletoes12

… like the drummer boy has an earring in his eye …

Drummer boy  😆

 

I measured the weight of 114 quarters all Unc or AU, all circulation strikes.. Here's the results:

5.67 gram weight is the nominal or target weight.  You don't make 1.7 billion of anything without an allowable variation in size, weight, composition, etc.

 

I'd love to see your coin with the earring in the drummer boy's eye.

Exactly. That's called a Normal distribution (i.e. Bell Curve).  They don't teach that in school anymore??

 

@rsirian1 is going to have to take these drummer boys back to school.  😀😀

I'm very much new to coin collecting it's something that I have found myself extremely fascinated with my only regret is not spending more time with my grandfather.. it takes growing up to see all the opportunities that was missed.. but I am just now realizing that there's tolerances when it comes to weight and this one particular quarter threw me off because I've never found anything that was supposed to be 5.67 weighing 5.76.. so yes they taught the bell curve in school but I graduated high school in 1993 and I didn't know that it applied when it comes to the weight of coins.. but I never run away from an opportunity to be schooled.. I'm going to try to see if I can get a picture that is suitable cuz I'm in the process of waiting on my scope.. so I'm literally using a magnifying glass attached to my phone.. a friend of mine looked at it and he was under the impression that it was PMD.. but either way I thought it looked pretty cool.

I have three bicentennial quarter one weigh 5.75 grams and the other weigh 5.67 grams and no mint mark on any of them is it something valuable

No. They made 810,000,000 of them right in your town of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US of A. I get about 3 in my change every week. I explained this to you a month ago. https://en.numista.com/forum/topic161878.html#p1254738

I also have a bicentennial quarter although mine is Denver minted, that weighs 5.5 g. Mine has very little if any copper shown on the edge and the edge seems quite different than a normal quarter as well. I'm attaching a picture for reference- the quarter I am referring to is on the left and a regular quarter is pictured on the right. Any opinions appreciated.

» Forumsregeln

Die verwendete Zeitzone ist UTC+2:00.
Die aktuelle Zeit ist 16:23.