The article
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces305.html
requires many corrections.
1. In mintage section there are just a few lines.
There should be lines for Mint Sets with text in comment 'in mint sets only' for the years
1968-1989.
There should be lines for Proof-like Sets for the years
1968 -1989.
Optional. Those, who like to consider, that it is important, not just the coin itself, but the way, how mint sales it,
types of V.I.P Mint set with text in comment 'in V.I.P. mint sets only' may be added in the years
1969-1976;
and of Custom Proof-like Sets with text in comment 'in custom proof-like sets only' for the years
1971, 1973-1980.
Right now, most probably due to copy from the Standard Catalog of World coins the mintage list is too short.
2. There is a line in mintage section
1970 0.3% Silver (rare)
Note. Obviously the percentage is from wrongly described occurrence of lines and has nothing to do with frequency as it expected to be. This is not the case of this topic and in this post onwards this nonsense will be omitted.
So the line
1970 Silver (rare)
has nothing to do with this article at all. Numista policy is to put coins in the articles according to metal. Thus it should be either moved to the correspondent existing article or a new article for it should be created.
3. The missing letters in motto are result of the usage of dies, they are not varieties: from strike to strike the die changes and rows form fully struck letters to vanished letters may be collected. This or another way, they are not varieties. According to Numista policy about it, they should be deleted from the mintage section.
Thus 11 lines with missing letters in motto should be deleted.
4. The confirmation, that the coins 1974 and 1980 with missing S in TS engraver's initials, are the varieties, is necessary. Otherwise correspondent lines should be deleted.