Should City of Münster 1 Pfennig KM# 335 be split? [gelöst]

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces128573.html
The coin is listed as being issued in 1740, 1750, and 1758. These three years are listed as one type in Numista, Krause, Schön DM, Craig, Eklund, and ngccoin.com. Four show images of 1740, and two have no image.

But every image I've found of 1758 look to me like a different type. Is this enough of a difference to split the type, of should the alternate picture be added to the existing listing.

Some links to images:
https://www.sixbid.com/en/katz-coins-notes-and-supplies-corp/8254/coins-german-states/6827876/german-states-munster-1-pfennig
https://www.biddr.com/auctions/katz/browse?a=1587&l=1710709
https://www.ebay.com/itm/173922366467
https://www.ebay.com/itm/274923338918

(Below is a link to an image of an old eBay auction.)
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2Fimages%2Fg%2FTvQAAOSwdQhfmxBu%2Fs-l300.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fitm%2FGermany-Munster-Stadt-Pfennig-copper-1758-VF-XF-%2F383786259511%3F_ul%3DDO&tbnid=feR728tvOUT1FM&vet=12ahUKEwjN6o7mw8rzAhWPhXIEHSfSD7cQMygDegQIARAX..i&docid=HD6pIxK0iuAsSM&w=300&h=149&itg=1&q=munster%20335%201758&client=ubuntu&ved=2ahUKEwjN6o7mw8rzAhWPhXIEHSfSD7cQMygDegQIARAX

Yes design is really different and deserves a split.
unforutnatelly some catalogues do not bother much with the lower denomination coins.

A new page has been created (with better images than I included above). I just submitted a change request to link the old 1740/1750 page to the new 1758 page.

(The 1750 I own is the same style as the 1740 picture in the listing.)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces308399.html