Add missing ruling authorities for papal states [gelöst]

Edit with new rulers:

-Guido Ascanio Sforza di Santa Fiora (Sede Vacante) (1549-1550)

Coin example: N#331974

Later Sede Vacante years by him are already on Numista

-Ludovico Trevisan (Sede Vacante) (1464)

Coin example: N#331977

-Benedict XIII (1394-1423) (Anti-Pope)

Coin example: N#337981

Urban VI (1378-1389)

Coin example: N#338432

-Clement VII (1378-1394) (Anti-Pope)

Coin example: N#278894

-Innocent VI (1352-1362)

Coin example: N#300485

-Clement VI (1342-1352)

Coin example: N#339426

-Benedict XII (1334-1342)

Coin example: N#300487

-John XXII (1316-1334)

Coin example: N#278893

-Pietro di Montebruno (Sede Vacante) (1268-1271)

Coin example: N#339792

It seems like some are during some phase of a Roman Senate? I'm not that familiar with that part of history. But I guess it should be possible to give these coins a clear ruling authority.

Also, it seems like not all of these should be listed under the Papal States to begin with (I guess it makes sense for Anti-Popes at least).

Also:

-Benedict XIII (1394-1423) (Anti-Pope)

Coin example: N#337981

But I'm probably writing with myself anyways here…

Trooper8

Also:

 

-Benedict XIII (1394-1423) (Anti-Pope)

Coin example: N#337981

 

But I'm probably writing with myself anyways here…

Careful: many links you shared are Comtat Venaissin, not Papal states.

I already asked here creation of ruling authorities for Comtat Venaissin 🙂

Compendium

Careful: many links you shared are Comtat Venaissin, not Papal states.

I already asked here creation of ruling authorities for Comtat Venaissin @

I'm in no way an expert on this topic. I just see coins that don't have an available ruling authority. If they should be moved into a different issuer altogether, then so be it.

Also, we plebs can't see topics in the referee forum…

There's another one:

Urban VI (1378-1389)

Coin example: N#338432

I hope it just takes so long because that invisible discussion is heatedly going on simultaneously…

It's slowly getting out of hand, issuers/rulers and what have you, a history nerd certainly, but a normal coin collector like me just want to keep it simple and stupid.

Sjoelund

It's slowly getting out of hand, issuers/rulers and what have you, a history nerd certainly, but a normal coin collector like me just want to keep it simple and stupid.

Let's make sure everyone is allowed to feel normal here, thanks! 😉

Trooper8

I'm in no way an expert on this topic. I just see coins that don't have an available ruling authority. If they should be moved into a different issuer altogether, then so be it.

Also, we plebs can't see topics in the referee forum…

There's another one:

 

Urban VI (1378-1389)

Coin example: N#338432

 

I hope it just takes so long because that invisible discussion is heatedly going on simultaneously…

I asked only 10 days ago, should be done soon :-)

I warned you just because some if these entries were created on you request recently: I already reordered them but wanted to raise awareness about this attribution fix.

Sorry for the referree link, my bad.

Added missing ones, this should be done now. :)