One more plagiarism

The article 

N#546

has comment which is a common plagiarism. 

The modification request was created just to remove it without any sanctions with respect to the plagiary. 

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/voir_demande.php?id=6241384

with the clarification

The existed image is a one more example of plagiarism.
The die classification was developed in 2018 and was confirmed in this article (see previous modifications). Later Ole substituted the information with his own production, using the classification which he did not develop without credit to his souse of information. That is why the first point is proved: the existing comment is plagiarism, should be removed.
 

and reply 

Rejected by Jarcek on 12th October 2022, 10:02
Comment: I would second Some_Nerd opinion on this.

For plagiarism cases were already mentioned earlier with respect to Ole (many people of Numista team were involved) and His Majesty (that how the Person who rejected the modification request names Himself)  (see the beginning of the topic  https://en.numista.com/forum/topic51669.html) these people can not be involved in the case as decision makers of course.
That is why this rejection is not valid.

In which way the plagiarism can be removed? Of course it is for Numista Authorities to decide about sanctions against plagiary.

From what I can see from modification history, at the time referee accepted Ole's change and overwritten your comment. While I understand it can make you angry and sad, it seems to me, and it certainly seemed to a at the time referee that Ole's description was more comprehensive.

As Ole did not use your images, I would say it is rather improvement for the catalogue rather than plagiarism.

As for sactions for Ole, I would gladly sanction whatever keeps him from doing more of these images.

As I read thru the buffet of whine and ridiculousness that seems to surround cyprusalexander like a cloud of odor surrounds a pigpen, I almost choked with surprise to see the words “…courtesy of Alexander…” in the same line.

Wow.

There is absolutely no plagiarism here. Please do some research about technical words you chose to use when attacking fellow Numista contributors (in a such weird manner, btw).