Separate pages for Malawi notes in 2000's ?

Hi

Does anybody have all notes from 2001 to 2011 from Malawi in hand to compare?

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?r=malawi&st=79&cat=y&im1=&im2=&ru=&ie=&ca=3&no=&v=&a=2001-2005&dg=&i=&b=&m=&f=&t=&t2=&w=&mt=&u=&g=&se=&c=&wi=&sw=

Each value has two Pick number and I don't really see why (except on 500 notes). If no clear differences are found, we should merge those pages of each value …

also here no extra details:

http://www.banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/AFR/MLW/MLW.htm#2001-2005%20Chilembwe%20/%20Ascending%20Size%20Serial%20%20Issue

referee: @Pcoetzee5 

Hallo Bram

Apologies for only getting back now, was away for a while.

I had a look at the information you send, and like you, I have been unable to find differences.  That said, I do not know why they were split into different types. We as referees do not assign KM or P numbers, we get it from other sources, like the Krause Catalogues, and I believe a new website from the new owners of the rights to the catalogues.

And there are some members who collect only one example of a KM or P number.  Not all are as mad as some of us to go into every variable available.  This is the resaon why I am inclined NOT to merge pages, unless I get absolute proof that the items are infact one and the same.

I have so many requests, where members want to split the same KM based on minor issues, and here I have the same reluctancy.

If our admin believe that we should merge the makes, I will support their decision.

Philip