2 Francs Leopold I I cross or no cross

Hi everyone,

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27 

Ok picked up a lot of coins and this one has me stumped, has it a cross or not. Looking at pictures  here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/past_sales.php?id=277  , I see a cross every item even if identified as without 

without cross https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/belgium-2-francs-km-30.2-1866-1868-cuid-1042332-duid-1284181 

the other variant  https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/belgium-2-francs-km-30.1-1866-1868-cuid-1044269-duid-1284180 

Thanking you in advance.

Next is grade, VG,F OR VF  

NGC AU50 - Leopold II, Cross on Crown 1867.

This one on ebay advertised as sans la Croix is it worn or the die was filled?

I am now continuing the search in French, I have yet to see one without, that looks to be worthy of the title at least, my own coin should be called  without the top part of cross.

 https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/belgium-2-francs-km-30.2-1866-1868-cuid-1042332-duid-1309023 

This is without a cross, I can clearly see a cross, its not perfect, the top is somewhat stumpy the right arm thinner and not level, is this defined as '' without a cross''  ?

My own coin would fall into this category, I am stumped much like that cross.

I was pricing another lot of coins, this time an 1886 Belgian 1 Fr. N#282 the interesting bit was this

 '' KM# 28.1 = signature with dot [L. WIENER]
KM# 28.2 = signature without dot [L WIENER]

The coins with signatures without dots, mentioned by Krause, Morin and Aernout, are probably die pollution and not real varieties.''

The coins I have seen, seem to be die pollution, rather than a variant, I see a cross, might not be whole or perfectly formed but a cross none the less,  

I cannot find out who first published the no cross variety, if the names mentioned above are involved then, I would have my suspicions.

I am not an expert, its just my opinion.