I think we may have talked about this before, but the coin listings above for the Victorian threepence covers both the circulation and Maundy coinage. The circulation mintage is generally in the millions while the Maundy mintage is only a few thousand and the coins are prooflike. I think to have a heading that says "Maundy Coinage" can be misleading and perhaps should be moved under comments inside the listing.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
hmm- I see your point. however: most early issues don't have mintage figures. We could only guess
how many of these were struck. what's clear is that these issues were used for Maundy money.
My point is to have in the title so that people see that this is actually used for Maundy money.
I already added information for the maundy issues / sets inside the description. so people
can distinguish circulation from maundy money.
I would also rather let it be this way because otherwise people might tend to add new coin sheets with
"maundy money" in the title (which already happened before verification of UK coins - there were
some double entries for maundy and circulation strikes)
I understand your point and I remember that the UK lisitngs were a bit of a mess before you and the team started checking and verifying all the data. Perhaps the answer is to add "including" or "incl." before the "Maundy Coinage" the clarify that the listing includes circulation and Maundy coinage.
Just because you can't see it ... doesn't mean it isn't there - Anon.
