Personal notes in the Philippines 10 sentimo 1995-2017 article

In the article
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1683.html

in year distribution there are lines:

2007 KM#270.2 (Value high on coin, different font) Obv. I
2007 KM#270.2 (Value high on coin, different font) Obv. III

Comments and description of Obverse (by mistake, the catalog switched the sides obviously) do not indicate the meanings of
Obv. I and Obv. III.

Is it possible to add the description of these most probably at least 3 types
Obv. I
Obv. II
Obv. III

in order to make the attribution of the coins?

is this what you're trying to find?


Described here: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces17107.html

Ole

No, of course not.

1. The mint produces dies for every denomination separately. It means, that though there is chance to see similar images on coins of different denominations, in majority of cases, the difference between them is large. That is why it is not a good idea to cite dies of one denomination in the article of another in this particular case.

2. This article (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1683.html) does not have any description of the dies. That is why it is worth to add it.

3. For the person, who introduced these notes in year distribution had something in his (her) mind, it is worth to describe his (her) ideas (vision) of the dies and their order in comment section.

4. If we can not find the right person, it is good for someone else to solve this riddle.

Note. Let us consider the die II.

For example on the today's moment in 10 piso coinage (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces4519.html) the die II was used in 2003 only. But in 1 piso (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces17107.html) it started in 2009 and works simultaneously with die I till 2009 and with die III from 2013. At the same time in 5 piso (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1680.html) die II got a partner die III one year earlier, in 2012. So it is not so simple as it may look at the beginning. And it is expected to get more discoveries in this interesting emission. For example this scheme already recommends to have a close look on 1 piso 2012 and discover an expected die III. And of course it is worth to examine all denominations of 2003 to find similar to 10 piso original dies.

I thought I understand English, but I apparently do not. Solution is so easy and Sjoelund just gave it to you. We can upload the image to the 10 Sentimo page.

Verweis : "cyprusalexander"​No, of course not.
​
​1. The mint produces dies for every denomination separately. It means, that though there is chance to see similar images on coins of different denominations, in majority of cases, the difference between them is large. That is why it is not a good idea to cite dies of one denomination in the article of another in this particular case.
​
​2. This article (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1683.html) does not have any description of the dies. That is why it is worth to add it.
​
​3. For the person, who introduced these notes in year distribution had something in his (her) mind, it is worth to describe his (her) ideas (vision) of the dies and their order in comment section.
​
​4. If we can not find the right person, it is good for someone else to solve this riddle.
​
​Note. Let us consider the die II.
​
​For example on the today's moment in 10 piso coinage (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces4519.html) the die II was used in 2003 only. But in 1 piso (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces17107.html) it started in 2009 and works simultaneously with die I till 2009 and with die III from 2013. At the same time in 5 piso (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1680.html) die II got a partner die III one year earlier, in 2012. So it is not so simple as it may look at the beginning. And it is expected to get more discoveries in this interesting emission. For example this scheme already recommends to have a close look on 1 piso 2012 and discover an expected die III. And of course it is worth to examine all denominations of 2003 to find similar to 10 piso original dies.

​I give up trying to understand and help this person, he's not worth the time spent on it, he simply can't be helped by a not medical person like me!

Ole

By the looks of it, I'll be using this image more and more often....