There are 2 articles about India 1 anna, which look strange.
1. Article https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1617.html states in Comments (please, do not pay attention to grammar stupidness, the catalog is full of such 'nonsense' as PJ classified them):
- Although KM reports the 1945 date for KM# 537a, none have been spotted
So it is expected no coins of year 1945 in Mintage section to be found. But, the Mintage sections gives:
1945 Calcutta Mint
1945 • Mumbai Mint
Does it mean that these lines should be removed?
2. Article https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces10784.html
gives proof without date, which is strange.
Does it mean, that instead of
ND Calcutta Mint; Proof
should be
1945 Calcutta Mint; Proof
? Or collectors can present this type in proof without date, could not they?